"Garmonbozia" is the closest thing to reality.

The best method to represent a feeling is to let it flow out of us without constraint into forms. In fact, in our minds, these feelings appear as star formations, bursts of color, and nebulous vibrations. We would define the whole as an abstract constellation.

Indeed, the most nihilistic individuals might find themselves saying that nothing we feel can be considered true, real, since it's impossible to define. Nothing could be further from the truth. If we take for granted that a ghost does not exist (and I, honestly, cannot know if this statement is true or not), what does exist are the sensations that its possible existence in the material world leaves us with. Just like the word "ghost" itself.

The feeling is defined, but its "plastic" representation will hardly be - unless one wants to risk falling into a banal figurativism of the human body. And that is why I believe abstraction is the closest representation to what is true, what is real. An example that supports my thesis is the following: Imagine you are faced with a set of brushes and objects that you can use to leave a mark on a flat, two-dimensional surface, and a tin bucket containing ink. If I were to ask you to leave a mark with the materials you have at your disposal, this will be the exact representation of your current condition. Why am I sure? Because if you were sad or angry, the marks would tend to be less rich in ink but full of straight lines and well-defined marks, perhaps dotted and concentrated in a limited area. On the other hand, if you were happy, the marks would be softer, rounder, comma-shaped, they would find themselves again, and the ink would be sparingly used over the entire available surface.